On May 5, 2026, Stefon Diggs was acquitted of serious assault charges in Dedham, Massachusetts. The case involved allegations from his former personal chef, Jamila Adams. The trial raised concerns about the opportunistic targeting of athletes in legal disputes.
The jury deliberated for less than two hours after a two-day trial. Adams testified that Diggs slapped and choked her during an argument at his home on December 2. However, Diggs pleaded not guilty to both a felony strangulation charge and a misdemeanor assault and battery charge.
Diggs’ attorney, Andrew Kettlewell, stated that no assault ever occurred. He criticized the use of domestic violence claims for financial gain. Adams had initially demanded $19,000 but later sought $5.5 million through her attorney. This shift raised eyebrows regarding the motives behind the allegations.
The jury cleared Diggs of all charges, including one felony charge of strangulation and a misdemeanor charge of assault and battery. Following the trial, the New England Patriots released him despite his productive 2025 season, where he caught 85 passes for 1,013 yards.
Mitch Schuster, an expert in athlete representation, commented on the case. He said, “Fame and financial success shouldn’t strip someone of their presumption of innocence, but too often it does exactly that.” This sentiment reflects broader issues surrounding celebrity trials and public perception.
Adams’ credibility as a witness also came into question during the trial. Drew Virtue noted, “Was Ms. Adams a perfect witness? No. She was argumentative, avoidant, difficult.” Such factors complicate the narrative surrounding domestic violence allegations against high-profile individuals.
Diggs hopes to return to the NFL after this ordeal. The case highlights ongoing challenges athletes face in the court of public opinion when dealing with legal matters.
